VarSage is built to fill the space between raw variant files and human clinical reasoning: filtering, ranking, explaining, and documenting candidate variants without pretending that software replaces expert review.
by Milad EIDI
VarSage began from a practical need: facilitate variant reviews on research based patients, more auditable for the people doing the work.
The project reflects a clinical-genomics mindset: keep evidence domains separate, preserve provenance, show uncertainty plainly, and make every conclusion available for human review.
Why it exists
Variant interpretation can become a maze of annotation fields, inheritance assumptions, population frequency thresholds, phenotype terms, and report wording. VarSage turns that maze into a structured review path.
AI can be enabled for selected steps, but its role remains bounded: support summarization and review prioritization, never issue a diagnosis or laboratory classification.
Design principles
What VarSage helps with
Rare-disease prioritization, HPO-driven phenotype matching, optional AI HPO extraction, Jannovar annotation, BED-region filtering, coordinate annotation database merging, provisional ACMG/AMP evidence summaries, and exportable HTML, TSV, Word, and carrier-screening review reports.

